So where were we? Navel gazing I think.
Getting to know myself, and what I, me, personal singular upright pro-noun, wanted to do with the rest of my life. (and oh, there is LOADS I leave out. Great heaping piles of loads. Lots and lots and lots. I simplify out of sheer, bloody editorial need)
Fact is, that once I GOT to the point of realizing I needed to at least have a cup-of-coffee-maybe-a-sandwich with myself, it was a lot easier. Because the What I Want To Do When I Grow Up was sort of sorted years and years ago. While Kirk saw university as a means to an end (and a bit of entertainment on the way - dude DID love to get stuck in to the odd academic debate), for me it was the end itself. I loved it - all of it. I was a dusty old history major reveling in things like how changes in illumination techniques reflected changes in politics and philosophy during the middle ages (genuine essay) or what the development of the romantic approach to landscape gardening in England - most popularly represented by the works of Capability Brown - said about British political philosophy vs French of the same or just earlier period (honors thesis! Try to out-nerd THAT, bitches!!).
So while getting to the angsty point of deciding that maybe yes I should think a little bit about what I wanted to DO and not just where I didn't want to BE was very hard and time-consuming, actually deciding what I wanted to do was easy.
The astute will notice that there is a slight trend in the above two essays, and the history academic nerds will spot that I tended toward the fringe of history... cultural or physical history. In other words, I like the bits and bobs people leave behind, and I'm interested in the story those things tell while other (I've heard the term 'pure' bandied about) historians like events. It's a large world, we can all be friends.
BUT
Fact is, I like stuff. I like looking at THINGS and PLACES and noodling out what happened there. In other words, I'm right on the boundary between two disciplines - history, and archaeology, and, frankly, I already had a degree in one and the science and practical nature of the other was making all my nerdy little antennae (do nerds have antennae??) just HUM.
So, it wasn't too hard to realize that I really, really REALLY really, truly and most absolutely, wanted to go back into grad school and get an advanced degree in archaeology.
I enjoyed that easy bit, I really did. 'Cause then we were right back into the hard bit again which was that I had to... gulp, actually apply for graduate school.
No really now, think about that.
I'm not the normal age for grad school - I'm way older. I haven't been an undergrad for ages. The small bit of post-grad work I've done is not remotely related. Also I'm way older. And...um, I'm older?
Also, I knew where I wanted to go, and those schools weren't by any means small-potato schools. Which meant I had to send off my... um, stuff, like my ancient old dusty undergrad records, AND letters of recommend, AND AND AND some writing samples that might possibly be applicable and not make the evaluation committee secretly make copies so they could hand them around at department cocktail parties as ice-breaker jokes.
What I'm trying to say is that, for me, a class 1-A certified perfectionist with a double major in PANIC WORRYING this was a little difficult.
True to form I spent two months writing my two samples which took the following pattern:
1) IDEA! Is brilliant! Am very pleased. Tell everyone how fab ideas is. Begin research
2) Research is FUN! Also research has many and varied paths that one can rabbit down and get lost in. This is GOOD because it is RESEARCH and not at all being distracted by shiny things.
3) Writing. Writing is FOUL. The ideas are foul. Also stupid. Also wrong. Totally wrong. And unoriginal. Odd how many people have written about this wrong idea - stupid people. How could they not see how wrong it is.
4). Fine. Write it anyway. It doesn't matter. Deadlines approach (artificial but I am a slave to my own expectations). Crank it out, there's no hope, it's all useless and they will all laugh and reject you and it will be in a kind letter which is the WORST because you have to supply all the rude adjectives they totally really will mean to say about your work but are too kind to really say outright. But at least it's done, first draft, finished. Don't look at it because it REEKS.
5) Edit. Not... as bad... as I thought. There's actual cogent thought here - only now and then, mind you, but it's there. It might be... okay. maybe.
6) Submit. EXCEPT IT'S NOT OKAY. Not now I've sent it! There are sure to be MASSIVE holes in the argument. Surely someone else has thought of that and REJECTED it already! Probably someone related to that program. Probably the person who is reading it RIGHT NOW.
It's fun, it is, being a perfectionist!
However, I had a couple aces up my sleeve. I had a fabulous man who taught two classes for me - Tropes, and Style Analysis. He runs the arroyo paths through the city with a group of guys who call themselves the Sons of Ditches. He claims to be utterly incapable when it comes to technology, but he writes a Weekly Wonk and can be found on YouTube. And yes, I'm linking, and I'm boosting, and I'm totally suggesting you check this guy out because he not only has a love for language, he has a voice that makes you love it too. (Honestly, have a listen to that third link, if nothing else for an important introduction to The World's Worst Poet).
I also had a woman who delights me, terrifies me, and inspires me. She is in her 80's now, and stands (physically) under five foot tall, but she is truly amazing. A friend of mine went to a conference with this woman and found himself following in her wake as ripples of awed comments spread around her (is that HER? I think it is... is she presenting? She's THERE! I want to... would she mind if I?). He said it was the closest he would get to being a groupie. She is at work on a book on Beowulf that is so revolutionary the Oxford University press has, as I understand it, backed out of publication because she's being too radical. That delights her and infuriates her. She has kept me busy chasing down images from so-and-so's psalter and whoozit's prayer book to support her arguments and I have loved every single moment of it. She rocks my world.
So I don't think it's a coincidence that after I went through the umpteen screens of fill-in-the-blank, and I (trembling) uploaded my two sad essays, and provided scans of my ancient undergrad transcripts, after all that, when my dear Tropist on the one hand, and my delightful Beowulfist on the other had entered their letters of recommendation, it took less than 24 hours for both my first choice schools to send acceptance letters.
So there it is.
That's the Big Plan.
I'm going to go back to school - to grad school. I'm enrolled for post-grad work in archaeology (specifically Medieval archaeology) at a very good school in the UK.
And I'm unbelievably excited.
And terrified.
Truly, deeply, terrified.
But excited. Really.